Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:04
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What is the best sunscreen available for summers? My skin is oily.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
The Largest Black Hole Jet Ever Found Is 3 Times the Size of the Milky Way - The Daily Galaxy
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
USMNT, messy and meek, unravels quickly for its fourth straight defeat - The Washington Post
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Free agent CB Rasul Douglas doesn’t think he’ll return to Green Bay - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What is the more common way to say "you're welcome" in French: “De rien” or “Pas de problème”?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
A Japanese lander crashed on the Moon after losing track of its location - Ars Technica
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.